*The game referenced in this article is ‘The Tribez‘ offered by Game Insight UAB.
Consider the following situation:
You currently have one worker remaining. You can use that worker to produce either lumber or rocks
Opportunity A: Lumber
- Lumber available to produce Sun Tiles
- With Sun Tiles, you can produce Furniture and sell it for a profit of 1400 Gold
- 1 Worker
- 30 Minutes of Labor
- 50 Wood
- 50 Energy (Food)
- If you use the worker for lumber, you cannot use the same worker for rocks. So you lose all benefits of Opportunity B.
Opportunity B: Rocks
- Rocks available to produce Stones
- With Rocks, you can purchase building materials to improve your home.
- 60 Gold
- 1 Worker
- 15 Minutes of Labor
- If you use the worker for rocks, you cannot use the same worker for lumber. So you lose all benefits of Opportunity A.
Both Opportunity A and B have good results (Pros) and costs (Cons). The problem is something economists call a Trade-Off – a situation where choosing something means sacrificing something else in return. Trade-offs arise where limitations exist on what is possible; where (because of scarcity or some other restrictions) our choices have costs. Rarely, if ever is there a difficult or complex decision to be made that does not involve a trade-off in life. All decisions worth considering involve some cost – otherwise the solutions would be all too easy to identify.
In the example above, recall that this business has only one worker. They cannot magically create workers out of nothing, and the same worker cannot do two jobs at once. This company is now restricted and must make a choice. In economics, there is always a trade-off because all resources have multiple potential uses and only one can be done with any given resource at a time. The seller and buyer cannot both have the same $1 dollar bill. The worker can never use the exact same minute to both produce rocks and lumber. The trade-off one faces is the burden of the decision-making process.
In producing lumber, the first trade-off is one of raw materials for finished goods. In order to have the finished lumber, the company must sacrifice food, workers, and raw materials. In order to produce rocks the company must invest their money. There’s always a cost – the question is whether one of those opportunities is worth the cost.
From this question is the trade-off formula derived.
To determine whether a cost is worth paying, we utilize standard decision-making processes. We compare the Pros (benefits) and Cons (costs) and determine whether the Result is positive (worth paying the cost) or negative (not worth the cost).
The Pros and Cons can be tangible or intangible and are based on the Interests (selfish or social) of the decision-maker. The Pros and Cons are the incentives that motivate us to choose whether we select Opportunity A or Opportunity B.
Alternative example: You are offered two job opportunities:
A) They provide a company car and 30 days of paid vacation alongside all major holidays. $80,000 in salary. You must work nights and weekends.
B) They provide free lunch daily and 30 days of paid vacation. $75,000. You work days, and have nights and weekends off. You must work on New Years Day.
Which would you choose?
- Opportunity A -> Company Car, additional $5,000 in salary. All holidays off.
- Opportunity B -> Free lunches, not working nights or weekends.
- Opportunity A -> Must pay for your own lunch. Work nights and weekends.
- Opportunity B -> $5,000 salary less. No company car. Work New Years Day.
*Note the 30 days vacation is identical no matter what you choose and is thus insignificant in decision-making.
|Incentive||Those things that motivate one to choose Option A.|
|Pros||Positive incentives that motivate a person to select one opportunity. Rewards or benefits received from that choice.|
|Con||Negative incentives that motivate a person to avoid an opportunity. Punishments or costs paid when that choice occurs.|
|Trade-Off||Where choosing one opportunity results in a sacrifice in return. Where there is a cost to the choice.|
The information offered through our Services is general information only and may not apply to every individual. We make no warranties or promises regarding the accuracy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of the data herein. This information is not intended for reliance. Under no circumstances will Blessing Associates, LLC or its owners & operators be liable for any problems that may result from using or reading this information. Individuals with a particular issue are recommended to contact attorney’s privately for tailored solutions.
The use of the Internet or phone as means of contacting this firm or any individual attorney of this
firm will not establish an attorney‐client relationship, thus do not use this form to submit confidential or time‐sensitive information. Whether you are a new or existing client of the firm, Blessing Associates, LLC cannot represent you on any new matter until the firm has made a determination that there is no conflict of interest and that it is willing and otherwise able to accept the new engagement. Unless
and until Blessing Associates, LLC has informed you it is willing and able to accept your new matter, do not send the firm any information or documents that you consider private or confidential. No attorney-client relationship is created without the formal signature of a contract and prior agreement by both parties. Continued use of our Services serves as evidence that you approve our Privacy Policies and Terms & Conditions.
One thought on “Living Economics: Incentive Driven Trade-Offs”